News

Explained: The Delhi excise policy row and the charges against Manish Sisodia

The CBI conducted raids at the residence of Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia, prompting a sharp response from CM Arvind Kejriwal and the Aam Aadmi Party.

Written by : TNM Staff

Earlier this week, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) carried out searches at 31 places, including the residences of Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia and former Excise Commissioner Arava Gopi Krishna. The raids come after the central agency registered an FIR for alleged corruption and bribery in the formulation and execution of the excise policy brought out by the Delhi government last November. Manish Sisodia is among 13 people named as accused in the FIR registered in connection with alleged irregularities in the implementation of the policy. The central agency has also named two companies in the FIR.

The CBI search operation expanded to 31 locations in Delhi, Gurugram, Chandigarh, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Lucknow, and Bengaluru, which led to the recovery of “incriminating” documents, articles, digital records, etc, the officials had said.

The Aam Aadmi Party has condemned the raids, with Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal claiming that the agency was "asked from above" to harass its leaders. On the other hand, the BJP has asked the city government to come clean on its excise policy.

What was the excise policy with regard to liquor?

The Delhi Cabinet in its meeting on November 5, 2021 had decided to allow the opening of liquor shops in non-conforming areas too. A non-conforming area includes unauthorised areas or colonies, or those which are ordinarily not included in such policies. Under the policy, zonal licences were issued by the Excise Department to private bidders through an open auction for a total of 849 liquor stores — distributed into 32 zones each having 27 vends.

When the zonal licencees couldn’t open liquor vends due to restrictions in permissions from the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), a committee was set up by former Lieutenant Governor (LG) Anil Baijal, under the chairmanship of the DDA vice chairman, to find a solution.

The committee recommended shifting retail licensees from non-conforming wards to conforming wards in each zone. However, the issues persisted. Manish Sisodia has said the government suffered revenue losses of thousands of crores of rupees because shops could not open in non-conforming areas as licensees whose wards were conforming had a windfall gain.

Last month, LG Vinai Kumar Saxena recommended a probe by the CBI into the alleged violations of rules and procedural lapses in the implementation of the policy. Following this, the Delhi government withdrew the policy. A report prepared by the Vigilance Directorate on the role of excise officials in executing the policy observed that the Committee report was not submitted by the then Excise Commissioner A Gopi Krishna despite having the draft ready with him on July 4. Krishna is also one of the accused in the FIR and one of the 11 excise officials whose suspension was recommended by the current LG.

What does the CBI FIR against Sisodia say?

The CBI has alleged that there were many irregularities in the excise policy, including licensees getting undue favours, waivers or a reduction in the licence fee, as well as extensions of licences without approvals. The CBI’s FIR states that Manish Sisodia and the other accused public servants took decisions pertaining to the excise policy 2021-22 without the approval of competent authority with "an intention to extend undue favours to the licencees post tender”.

Under the CBI probe are at least two payments in crores allegedly made to “close associates” of Sisodia by Sameer Mahendru, the owner of Indospirits, who was one of the liquor traders actively involved in alleged irregularities in the framing and implementation of the excise policy. The FIR alleged Sisodia’s "close associates" — Amit Arora, director of Buddy Retail Pvt. Limited in Gurugram, Dinesh Arora and Arjun Pandey — were “actively involved in managing and diverting the undue pecuniary advantage collected from liquor licensees” to the accused public servants.

The CBI has invoked the sections under criminal conspiracy as well as provisions of the stringent Prevention of Corruption Act (PMLA). Public servants including Krishna, former Deputy Excise Commissioner Anand Tiwari and Assistant Excise Commissioner Pankaj Bhatnagar, nine businessmen and two companies are among those named in the FIR.

What has Manish Sisodia said?

Speaking to the media, Sisodia said, “The CBI team reached in the morning and searched the whole house. My family and I extended them full cooperation. They seized my computer and mobile phone. They also took away some files.” He as well as the ruling AAP and other opposition parties have alleged that the Union government was misusing the agency. “This is to stop the Arvind Kejriwal government from doing good work in Delhi,” Sisodia added.

Watch this week's Let Me Explain: Are 'freebies' bad and a waste of money? 

With agency inputs

Gautam Adani met YS Jagan in 2021, promised bribe of $200 million, says SEC

Activists call for FIR against cops involved in alleged “fake encounter” of Maoist

The Jagan-Sharmila property dispute and its implications on Andhra politics

The Indian solar deals embroiled in US indictment against Adani group

Maryade Prashne is an ode to the outliers of Bengaluru’s software gold rush