Cinema Paradiso Club takes a stand: Removes Dileep, Alencier from award nominee list

The decision by Cinema Paradiso Club to remove the two actors was a stand taken based on feedback and nuanced debates.
Cinema Paradiso Club takes a stand: Removes Dileep, Alencier from award nominee list
Cinema Paradiso Club takes a stand: Removes Dileep, Alencier from award nominee list
Published on

In a move which has triggered the age-old ‘seperate art from artist’ debate in the MeToo context, a popular Facebook community of movie aficionados in Kerala have decided to remove actors Dileep and Alencier from their list of annual award nominees for 2018.

The community in focus here is the Cinema Paradiso club - which was founded by a bunch of film lovers 7 years ago and has been noticed in recent times for awarding true talent in Mollywood, sans the usual dazzle and glitz seen in award shows.

This year, actors Dileep and Alencier Lopez - who have been accused of plotting a rape and sexual harassment respectively were in the initial list of nominees eligible to win awards.

However, after discussions which spread over several months, a decision was made to remove those accused of sexual harassment from the list.

“We are not passing any judgement against these actors. But a popular opinion arose that nominating these actors would be totally unfair to the victims they have been accused of harassment,” Arun Ashok, a member of CPC told TNM.

The awardee nominations for the Cinema Paradiso Club were done in two parts. Initially, a sweeping list of names of eligible actors were presented to the members for shortlisting based on popularity. Following this, the shortlisted actors names were sent to a 25-member jury panel which selected the winner.

Arun explains that it was in the long list of actors that Dileep and Alencier’s names had cropped up - Dileep in the best actor category for Kammara Sambhavam (2018) and Alencier in the Best Supporting Actor Category for several films. Both the names were struck down before the list was sent to the jury panel.

“The discussions first began when Alencier was accused of sexual harassment back in October 2018. The actor even admitted to the allegations later on. In Dileep’s case, the matter is sub judice and he is an accused in the high profile case. Therefore nominating him based on popularity, with the shadow of the sexual assault charges looming over the actor, would be inappropriate, we decided,” Arun adds.

To separate art from artist 

Although several members argued against striking down the names of the actors citing that talent should be recognised in isolation, the stance taken by Cinema Paradiso Club’s members was with the awareness that it was sometimes impossible to separate art from the artist.

“Both these incidents happened within the realm of their workplaces - it happened within the film industry. The politics of it is very much a part of the work done by these actors. Therefore, we cannot separate the two,” the club members opined.

Additionally, several stars with skeletons tumbling out of their closet hide behind their popularity and get away with it, the club realised.

“Popularity plays a huge role in shaping public perception about the actors. Many times, fans and audiences, tend to ignore or trivialise the dark side of the actors due to their sheer popularity. This has happened with Charlie Chaplin, legendary directors Woody Allen and Roman Polanski etc. In the West, where their achievements overshadow everything else. We had decided that this shouldn’t happen when we select actors for the awards,” Arun adds.

The members also discussed withdrawing the award presented to Alencier back in 2017 (the second edition of the awards). This was considered after Hollywood actor Kevin Spacey’s Emmy was withdrawn following sexual harassment allegations against him.

The members later decided that they would not do so with Alencier as the MeToo incident incriminating him had not taken place when the award was given.

Full statement:

Many times, the crimes or the seriousness of the crimes committed by people in cinema and other fields are diluted because of the goodwill they cultivated among people. The pangs of the person who had to face an exploitation ends in an inexistent argument that "watch films as films only".
 
But history has proven that time will not always be with those who exploit. We have seen many examples of it. The awards taken back from those who exploit, the move to set them aside is a beginning.
 
It’s a reminder to those people who have used their position, power and goodwill to exploit that your crimes no matter how big you are will come back to bite you.  
The discussions on the group about recent incidents in Malayalam cinema of assault and exploitation had invariably led us to make such a move. We have decided to remove
the names of Dileep and Alencier in the final list of nominees. We have, however, not avoided the movies they have been a part of. We exist as a group of movie afficianados who have stands on socio-environmental issues. And we believe that this decision will strengthen the growth of CPC.

Related Stories

No stories found.
The News Minute
www.thenewsminute.com